[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121213073056.GA13156@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:30:56 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v3.8
* David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> > But doing it this way was wrong. Switch that "exclude_guest"
> > attribute around, and admit that "H" was bogus, and that the
> > right thing to do was to add a "V" flag that sets the
> > "force_guest" flag instead.
>
> I understand this is annoying. [...]
It's not annoying, it's outright broken - it's a regression that
we'll fix.
> [...] Older binaries on newer kernels was the only case I
> could not fix. [...]
The "only" case?? Old, working binaries are actually our _most_
important usecase: it's 99.9% of our current installed base ...
> [...] (I guess a message could be added kernel side to at
> least give a hint.) But the alternative -- based on code that
> has existed for some time -- is for older binaries to crash
> VMs.
That should be fixed differently, by not breaking existing
working functionality.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists