[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <50C9B14602000078000B00C3@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:43:18 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Daniel Santos" <daniel.santos@...ox.com>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: <david.daney@...ium.com>, <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] utilize _Static_assert() for BUILD_BUG_ON() when
the compiler supports it
>>> On 13.12.12 at 01:29, Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@....net> wrote:
> Wow, it's really easy to miss parallel development on the same issue.
> Sorry for my late response to this thread. I started another thread
> addressing these issues (as well as a few others) back in September
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/28/1136). I've finally gotten ACKs from
> maintainers with v6 of the patches (here
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/20/621) and I'm just waiting for 3.8-rc1
> to re-submit them. I actually submitted these patches back in June as
> part of a larger patch set, but broke it apart in September (I had way
> to many changes for one patch set)
Since yours is apparently ready to go in, but doesn't use
_Static_assert, I guess I'll wait for it to appear until I re-work
whatever might be left to actually make use of _Static_assert.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists