linux-kernel - [PATCH 150/241] futex: avoid wake_futex() for a PI futex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1355407206-17100-151-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:58:35 -0200
From:	Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 150/241] futex: avoid wake_futex() for a PI futex_q

3.5.7.2 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>

commit aa10990e028cac3d5e255711fb9fb47e00700e35 upstream.

Dave Jones reported a bug with futex_lock_pi() that his trinity test
exposed.  Sometime between queue_me() and taking the q.lock_ptr, the
lock_ptr became NULL, resulting in a crash.

While futex_wake() is careful to not call wake_futex() on futex_q's with
a pi_state or an rt_waiter (which are either waiting for a
futex_unlock_pi() or a PI futex_requeue()), futex_wake_op() and
futex_requeue() do not perform the same test.

Update futex_wake_op() and futex_requeue() to test for q.pi_state and
q.rt_waiter and abort with -EINVAL if detected.  To ensure any future
breakage is caught, add a WARN() to wake_futex() if the same condition
is true.

This fix has seen 3 hours of testing with "trinity -c futex" on an
x86_64 VM with 4 CPUS.

[akpm@...ux-foundation.org: tidy up the WARN()]
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...at.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
---
 kernel/futex.c |   18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 20ef219..19eb089 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -843,6 +843,9 @@ static void wake_futex(struct futex_q *q)
 {
 	struct task_struct *p = q->task;
 
+	if (WARN(q->pi_state || q->rt_waiter, "refusing to wake PI futex\n"))
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * We set q->lock_ptr = NULL _before_ we wake up the task. If
 	 * a non-futex wake up happens on another CPU then the task
@@ -1078,6 +1081,10 @@ retry_private:
 
 	plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, head, list) {
 		if (match_futex (&this->key, &key1)) {
+			if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) {
+				ret = -EINVAL;
+				goto out_unlock;
+			}
 			wake_futex(this);
 			if (++ret >= nr_wake)
 				break;
@@ -1090,6 +1097,10 @@ retry_private:
 		op_ret = 0;
 		plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, head, list) {
 			if (match_futex (&this->key, &key2)) {
+				if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) {
+					ret = -EINVAL;
+					goto out_unlock;
+				}
 				wake_futex(this);
 				if (++op_ret >= nr_wake2)
 					break;
@@ -1098,6 +1109,7 @@ retry_private:
 		ret += op_ret;
 	}
 
+out_unlock:
 	double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
 out_put_keys:
 	put_futex_key(&key2);
@@ -1387,9 +1399,13 @@ retry_private:
 		/*
 		 * FUTEX_WAIT_REQEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI should always
 		 * be paired with each other and no other futex ops.
+		 *
+		 * We should never be requeueing a futex_q with a pi_state,
+		 * which is awaiting a futex_unlock_pi().
 		 */
 		if ((requeue_pi && !this->rt_waiter) ||
-		    (!requeue_pi && this->rt_waiter)) {
+		    (!requeue_pi && this->rt_waiter) ||
+		    this->pi_state) {
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			break;
 		}
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/