[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121213135726.GE29086@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:27:26 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Alex Shi <lkml.alex@...il.com>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix task_numa_fault() + KSM crash
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> [2012-12-10 13:44:58]:
> Srikar Dronamraju reported that the following assert triggers on
> his box:
>
> kernel BUG at ../kernel/sched/fair.c:2371!
>
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8113cd0e>] __do_numa_page+0xde/0x160
> [<ffffffff8113de9e>] handle_pte_fault+0x32e/0xcd0
> [<ffffffffa01c22c0>] ? drop_large_spte+0x30/0x30 [kvm]
> [<ffffffffa01bf215>] ? kvm_set_spte_hva+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> [<ffffffff8113eab9>] handle_mm_fault+0x279/0x760
> [<ffffffff8115c024>] break_ksm+0x74/0xa0
> [<ffffffff8115c222>] break_cow+0xa2/0xb0
> [<ffffffff8115e38c>] ksm_scan_thread+0xb5c/0xd50
> [<ffffffff810771c0>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40
> [<ffffffff8115d830>] ? run_store+0x340/0x340
> [<ffffffff8107692e>] kthread+0xce/0xe0
>
> This means that task_numa_fault() was called for a kernel thread
> which has no fault tracking.
>
> This scenario is actually possible if a kernel thread does
> fault processing on behalf of a user-space task - ignore
> the page fault in that case.
>
> Also remove the (now never triggering) assert and robustify
> a nearby assert.
>
I do confirm that with this change, I dont see the assert anymore.
> Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 9d11a8a..61c7a10 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2351,6 +2351,13 @@ void task_numa_fault(unsigned long addr, int node, int last_cpupid, int pages, b
> int priv;
> int idx;
>
> + /*
> + * Kernel threads might not have an mm but might still
> + * do fault processing (such as KSM):
> + */
> + if (!p->numa_faults)
> + return;
> +
> if (last_cpupid != cpu_pid_to_cpupid(-1, -1)) {
> /* Did we access it last time around? */
> if (last_pid == this_pid) {
> @@ -2367,8 +2374,8 @@ void task_numa_fault(unsigned long addr, int node, int last_cpupid, int pages, b
>
> idx = 2*node + priv;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(last_cpu == -1 || node == -1);
> - BUG_ON(!p->numa_faults);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(last_cpu == -1 || node == -1))
> + return;
>
> p->numa_faults_curr[idx] += pages;
> shared_fault_tick(p, node, last_cpu, pages);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists