[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50CA00E8.1030404@openwrt.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:23:04 +0100
From: Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC GIT PULL] "Nuke 386-DX/SX support" changes for v3.8
Le 12/12/12 19:04, Linus Torvalds a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> This tree removes ancient-386-CPUs support and thus zaps quite a
>> bit of complexity:
>
> Btw, I think we should probably at least consider taking this one step
> further, and remove the dear old FPU emulation support too. Remove
> CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION and all of arch/x86/math-emu, along with a lot
> of small special cases.
>
> Or do people still use the 486SX?
Yes, the RDC-R321x SoC which is supported by mainline actually needs
Math emulation to properly work.
>
> Now, the math emulation hasn't been all that fundamentally problematic
> (compared to lack of xadd etc), but it does result in some
> complexities in exception handling and ptrace (grep for HAVE_HWFP or
> "hard_math" or a number of other magic things). None of which have
> likely been tested at all in the last ten years, so who knows if it
> actually *works* or not.
>
> Maybe somebody could try booting with "no387". Does it actually work?
Ok, I could try that.
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists