[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50CA0529.2050506@tilera.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:41:13 -0500
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/tile: provide PT_FLAGS_COMPAT value in pt_regs
On 12/13/2012 11:27 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 12/13, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> On 12/13/2012 10:49 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> But ptrace_setoptions() returns EINVAL? it doesn't accept illegal bits.
>> It does return EINVAL - but if it gets both legal and illegal bits,
>> it honors all the legal bits first.
> This was true in the past, but now we have
>
> static int ptrace_setoptions(struct task_struct *child, unsigned long data)
> {
> unsigned flags;
>
> if (data & ~(unsigned long)PTRACE_O_MASK)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* Avoid intermediate state when all opts are cleared */
> flags = child->ptrace;
> flags &= ~(PTRACE_O_MASK << PT_OPT_FLAG_SHIFT);
> flags |= (data << PT_OPT_FLAG_SHIFT);
> child->ptrace = flags;
>
> return 0;
> }
Yup, I was looking at an older version of the code by mistake. See patch to follow. Thanks!
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists