[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121213170845.GA11145@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:08:45 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: anish singh <anish198519851985@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: export 'debounce' attribute if supported by the
gpio chip
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:37:35AM -0800, anish singh wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Roeck
> <groeck-dsl@...global.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:04:09AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> I could imagine declaring the activity request buttons to be "input", but for
> >> >> presence detects it is a bit far fetched and would add too much complexity.
> >> >
> >> > Android tries to address this with its switch class driver, but I'm not
> >> > sure its actually got anything over making them input devices.
> >>
> >> This has actually been merged into the kernel proper as drivers/extcon.
> >>
> >> So another poke on Günther if this fulfills the needs?
> >>
> > I'll look into it. Currently I am hampered by a cold which seems to mug my
> > brain, and technically by the need to backport extcon to 3.0 (if that is even
> > possible) since our chip vendor does not yet support a more recent kernel.
> It is very much possible.I have already tried that and it works.
Confirmed.
Looks like this is going to work for me, so I won't need the gpio patch. Please
ignore it.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists