[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50CA2194.40103@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:42:28 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH 16/26] x86: Convert print_symbol to %pSR
On 12/13/2012 10:37 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>
>> If appropriate, the code could be changed to
>>
>> (void *)(unsigned long)m->ip
>
> Can we explicitly cast it to what it is so that we can be explicit as to
> what we're casting it? IOW:
>
> (void *)(__u64)m->ip;
>
> Does that even work on 32bit?
>
> Also, does the compiler bitch about this useless cast when building with
> W=123?
>
Uh... no.
The point is that (void *)(unsigned long) casts it to an integer of
pointer size -- in userspace you would to (void *)(size_t) or (void
*)(uintptr_t) -- so that the compiler knows "I meant to do that."
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists