[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50C942AE.6010102@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:51:26 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
CC: Alex Shi <lkml.alex@...il.com>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, rob@...dley.net,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
andre.przywara@....com, rjw@...k.pl, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pjt@...gle.com,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/18] sched: simplified fork, enable load average into
LB and power awareness scheduling
On 12/12/2012 10:21 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> >> If Linux is to continue to work efficiently on heterogeneous
>>> >> multi-processing platforms, it needs to provide scheduling mechanisms
>>> >> that can be exploited as per the demands of the HW architecture.
>> >
>> > Linus definitely disagree such ideas. :) So, need to summaries the
>> > logical beyond all hardware.
>> >
>>> >> example is the "small task packing (and spreading)" for which Vincent
>>> >> Guittot has posted a patchset[1] earlier and so has Alex now.
>> >
>> > Sure. I just thought my patchset should handled the 'small task
>> > packing' scenario. Could you guy like to have a try?
> Hi Alex,
>
> Yes, I will do a try with your patchset when i will have some spare time
Thanks Vincent! the balance and powersaving policy should have effect.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists