linux-kernel - [PATCH rev.2 4/6] ACPI: Reduce the usage of struct acpi_bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1597613.RyAsvSHuB3@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:21:57 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing0307@...il.com>,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH rev.2 4/6] ACPI: Reduce the usage of struct acpi_bus_ops

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Objects of type struct acpi_bus_ops are currently used to pass
information between different parts of the ACPI namespace scanning
code, sometimes in quite convoluted ways.  It turns out that that
is not necessary in some cases, so simplify the code by reducing
the utilization of struct acpi_bus_ops objects where clearly
possible.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c |   40 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

Index: linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1527,7 +1527,6 @@ end:
 static void acpi_bus_add_power_resource(acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	struct acpi_bus_ops ops = {
-		.acpi_op_add = 1,
 		.acpi_op_start = 1,
 		.acpi_op_match = 1,
 	};
@@ -1581,7 +1580,6 @@ static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi
 static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl,
 				      void *context, void **return_value)
 {
-	struct acpi_bus_ops *ops = context;
 	struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
 	int type;
 	unsigned long long sta;
@@ -1605,11 +1603,13 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(ac
 	}
 
 	acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device);
-	if (ops->acpi_op_add && !device) {
-		struct acpi_bus_ops add_ops = *ops;
+	if (!device) {
+		struct acpi_bus_ops ops = {
+			.acpi_op_start = !!context,
+			.acpi_op_match = 0,
+		};
 
-		add_ops.acpi_op_match = 0;
-		acpi_add_single_object(&device, handle, type, sta, &add_ops);
+		acpi_add_single_object(&device, handle, type, sta, &ops);
 		if (!device)
 			return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
 
@@ -1652,17 +1652,18 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attac
 	return status;
 }
 
-static int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_bus_ops *ops,
+static int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle handle, bool start,
 			 struct acpi_device **child)
 {
 	void *device = NULL;
 	acpi_status status;
 	int ret = -ENODEV;
 
-	status = acpi_bus_check_add(handle, 0, ops, &device);
+	status = acpi_bus_check_add(handle, 0, (void *)start, &device);
 	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
 		acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
-				    acpi_bus_check_add, NULL, ops, &device);
+				    acpi_bus_check_add, NULL, (void *)start,
+				    &device);
 
 	if (!device)
 		goto out;
@@ -1696,9 +1697,7 @@ int
 acpi_bus_add(struct acpi_device **child,
 	     struct acpi_device *parent, acpi_handle handle, int type)
 {
-	struct acpi_bus_ops ops = { .acpi_op_add = 1, };
-
-	return acpi_bus_scan(handle, &ops, child);
+	return acpi_bus_scan(handle, false, child);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_add);
 
@@ -1796,12 +1795,10 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void)
 {
 	int result = 0;
 	struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
-	struct acpi_bus_ops ops;
-
-	memset(&ops, 0, sizeof(ops));
-	ops.acpi_op_add = 1;
-	ops.acpi_op_start = 1;
-	ops.acpi_op_match = 1;
+	struct acpi_bus_ops ops = {
+		.acpi_op_start = 1,
+		.acpi_op_match = 1,
+	};
 
 	/*
 	 * Enumerate all fixed-feature devices.
@@ -1827,11 +1824,6 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void)
 int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
 {
 	int result;
-	struct acpi_bus_ops ops;
-
-	memset(&ops, 0, sizeof(ops));
-	ops.acpi_op_add = 1;
-	ops.acpi_op_start = 1;
 
 	result = bus_register(&acpi_bus_type);
 	if (result) {
@@ -1845,7 +1837,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
 	/*
 	 * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
 	 */
-	result = acpi_bus_scan(ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, &ops, &acpi_root);
+	result = acpi_bus_scan(ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, true, &acpi_root);
 
 	if (!result)
 		result = acpi_bus_scan_fixed();

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/