[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50CA66F0.50804@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:38:24 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 18/27] x86, boot: add fields to support load bzImage
and ramdisk above 4G
On 12/13/2012 03:28 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:54 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>
>> 0x1f0 is unsuitable for use as sentinel -- or in fact for any purpose --
>> because it is quite plausible that someone may (fairly sanely) start the
>> copy range at 0x1f0 instead of 0x1f1... we really should have documented
>> it that way but it is too late now.
>>
>> However, we can use 0x1ef.
>
> right. updated to use 0x1ef.
>
> +1EF/001 ALL sentinel 0: states _ext_* fields are valid
Not the correct documentation. What this does is detect broken
32/64-bit bootloaders, and the remediation code should zero not just the
ext_* fields but all the fields that were identified as uninitialized --
we're kind of assuming that kexec is representative here, since it
doesn't help us by giving an ID.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists