[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50CAC905.9070100@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:36:53 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
CC: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk, pjt@...gle.com,
santosh.shilimkar@...com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
chander.kashyap@...aro.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
len.brown@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] sched: pack small tasks
On 12/14/2012 12:45 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> > Do you have further ideas for buddy cpu on such example?
>>> > >
>>> > > Which kind of sched_domain configuration have you for such system ?
>>> > > and how many sched_domain level have you ?
>> >
>> > it is general X86 domain configuration. with 4 levels,
>> > sibling/core/cpu/numa.
> CPU is a bug that slipped into domain degeneration. You should have
> SIBLING/MC/NUMA (chasing that down is on todo).
Maybe.
the CPU/NUMA is different on domain flags, CPU has SD_PREFER_SIBLING.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists