[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQXi6XZ9_7CDS_Ypgd59tSouhw8TCePCdJQNC7bhGMO8WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:44:03 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/27] x86, boot: update comments about entries for
64bit image
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:38 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 12/13/2012 04:13 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> It is definitely the minmum we can rely on, and so is the minimum we should
> rely on. In fact, we don't even need .bss/.brk to be mapped, but we
> probably should require that as a matter of protocol.
in my version of arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S is using BRK to do
ident/kernel high mapping
for kernel that is above 4G.
so .brk is needed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists