[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121214144927.GS4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:49:27 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, J??rn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Downgrade mmap_sem before locking or populating on
mmap
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:14:50AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Wait a minute. get_user_pages() relies on ->mmap_sem being held. Unless
> > I'm seriously misreading your patch it removes that protection. And yes,
> > I'm aware of execve-related exception; it's in special circumstances -
> > bprm->mm is guaranteed to be not shared (and we need to rearchitect that
> > area anyway, but that's a separate story).
>
> Unless I completely screwed up the patch, ->mmap_sem is still held for
> read (it's downgraded from write). It's just not held for write
> anymore.
Huh? I'm talking about the call of get_user_pages() in aio_setup_ring().
With your patch it's done completely outside of ->mmap_sem, isn't it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists