[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50CB493B.8000900@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:43:55 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] mm: vmscan: disregard swappiness shortly before going
OOM
On 12/14/2012 03:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I can answer the later. Because memsw comes with its price and
> swappiness is much cheaper. On the other hand it makes sense that
> swappiness==0 doesn't swap at all. Or do you think we should get back to
> _almost_ doesn't swap at all?
swappiness==0 will swap in emergencies, specifically when we have
almost no page cache left, we will still swap things out:
if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
free = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
if (unlikely(file + free <= high_wmark_pages(zone))) {
/*
* If we have very few page cache pages, force-scan
* anon pages.
*/
fraction[0] = 1;
fraction[1] = 0;
denominator = 1;
goto out;
This makes sense, because people who set swappiness==0 but
do have swap space available would probably prefer some
emergency swapping over an OOM kill.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists