[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50CBAC61.5010600@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:46:57 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, aarcange@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, criu@...nvz.org,
mingo@...hat.com, john.stultz@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [CRIU] [PATCH] Add VDSO time function support for x86 32-bit
kernel
On 12/14/2012 12:34 AM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> On 12/14/2012 06:20 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:18 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>> Wouldn't the vdso get mapped already and could be mremap()'d. If we
>> really need more control I'd almost push for a device/filesystem node
>> that could be mmapped the usual way.
>>
>> Hmm. That may work, but it'll still break ABI. I'm not sure that
>> criu is stable enough yet that we should care. Criu people?
>
> It's not yet, but we'd still appreciate the criu-friendly vdso redesign.
>
>> (In brief summary: how annoying would it be if the vdso was no longer
>> just a bunch of constant bytes that lived somewhere?)
>
> It depends on what vdso is going to be. In the perfect case it should
> a) be mremap-able to any address (or be at fixed address _forever_, but
> I assume this is not feasible);
> b) have entry points at fixed (or somehow movable) places.
>
> I admit that I didn't understand your question properly, if I did,
> please correct me.
>
Either way... criu on the side, we should proceed with this vdso
redesign and get support for the 32-bit entry points including compat
mode on x86-64.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists