[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121215203828.GX4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:38:29 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap_vout: find_vma() needs ->mmap_sem held
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 08:12:37PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Walking rbtree while it's modified is a Bad Idea(tm); besides,
> the result of find_vma() can be freed just as it's getting returned
> to caller. Fortunately, it's easy to fix - just take ->mmap_sem a bit
> earlier (and don't bother with find_vma() at all if virtp >= PAGE_OFFSET -
> in that case we don't even look at its result).
While we are at it, what prevents VIDIOC_PREPARE_BUF calling
v4l_prepare_buf() -> (e.g) vb2_ioctl_prepare_buf() -> vb2_prepare_buf() ->
__buf_prepare() -> __qbuf_userptr() -> vb2_vmalloc_get_userptr() -> find_vma(),
AFAICS without having taken ->mmap_sem anywhere in process? The code flow
is bloody convoluted and depends on a bunch of things done by initialization,
so I certainly might've missed something...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists