[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFz9+3mOZcjJ9C-izKkidT9mxeO7xUubJER0OTjcZjE=2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:11:04 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fbdev <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] fbdev changes for 3.8
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Florian, the fbdev maintainer, has been very busy lately, so I offered to send
> the pull request for fbdev for this merge window.
Pulled. However, with this I get the Kconfig question
OMAP2+ Display Subsystem support (OMAP2_DSS) [N/m/y/?] (NEW)
which doesn't make a whole lot of sense on x86-64, unless there's
something about OMAP2 that I don't know.
So I'd suggest making that OMAP2_DSS be dependent on OMAP2. Or at
least ARM. Because showing it to anybody else seems insane.
Same goes for FB_OMAP2 for that matter. I realize that it's likely
nice to get compile testing for this on x86-64 too, but if that's the
intent, we need to think about it some more. I don't think it's good
to ask actual normal users questions like this just for compile
coverage.
Hmm?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists