[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121216161921.GO2542@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 08:19:21 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL invisible and default
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:29:21AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 2012-10-03 18:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>
> >> OK, I will bite... How should I flag an option that is initially only
> >> intended for those willing to take some level of risk?
> >
> >In the text say "You really don't want to enable this option, use at
> >your own risk!" Or something like that :)
>
> You know that won't not work, just like "everybody is encouraged
> to upgrade" for -stable. It needs to say "All users must disable this!"
The thought expressed earlier in this thread of unconditionally splatting
during boot seemed pretty compelling to me. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists