[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUgEv0Ub8jAuuHzzOGqinbm0Nm5iiBs1ugRg5OT09h4+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 09:36:49 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing0307@...il.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ACPI: Simplify namespace scanning for devices
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This series is on top of the one I sent on Thursday:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/13/632
>
> It goes one step farther and makes some simplifications that become possible
> after applying that patchset.
>
> [1/6] Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into acpi_pci_root_add()
> [2/6] Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
> [3/6] Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used
> [4/6] Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_scan()
> [5/6] Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag
> [6/6] Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument
>
> It survives booting on Toshiba Portege R500 without any visible issues.
Do you have git branch that i could test?
I'd like to rebase for-pci-root-bus-hotplug patches, so what should be base?
It would be hard for me to base on your acpi tree and Bjorn's pci tree.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists