[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121216203913.GB14643@liondog.tnic>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:39:13 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Weidong Han <weidong.han@...el.com>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [regression] 3.7 ends in APIC panic
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 08:46:06PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hmm, I read it the other way around - x2apic depends on interrupt
> remapping, but interrupt remapping can be used without x2apic.
Ok, you're right. X2APIC should depend on IRQ_REMAP:
https://lwn.net/Articles/289881/
> The help text of CONFIG_IRQ_REMAP also says "x2APIC enhancements or to
> support platforms with CPU's having > 8 bit APIC ID, say Y." I guess
> may CPU has the latter?
I think it is what Yinghai said - you obviously need x2apic kernel
support if you have IRQ_REMAP on.
> Can the kernel panic a bit improved to help user to understand what
> needs to be enabled?
Well, your kernel enables IRQ_REMAP properly:
[ 0.031115] Enabled IRQ remapping in x2apic mode
I guess at that stage we could probably check for x2apic support and
scream loudly if it is not present... IMHO.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists