linux-kernel - Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Move disabling/enabling runtime PM to late suspend/early resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3558004.3QJ46yYCyI@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Sun, 16 Dec 2012 02:30:11 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jan-Matthias Braun <jan_braun@....net>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Move disabling/enabling runtime PM to late suspend/early resume

On Saturday, December 15, 2012 10:16:29 PM Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > 
> > Currently, the PM core disables runtime PM for all devices right
> > after executing subsystem/driver .suspend() callbacks for them
> > and re-enables it right before executing subsystem/driver .resume()
> > callbacks for them.  This may lead to problems when there are
> > two devices such that the .suspend() callback executed for one of
> > them depends on runtime PM working for the other.  In that case,
> > if runtime PM has already been disabled for the second device,
> > the first one's .suspend() won't work correctly (and analogously
> > for resume).
> > 
> > To make those issues go away, make the PM core disable runtime PM
> > for devices right before executing subsystem/driver .suspend_late()
> > callbacks for them and enable runtime PM for them right after
> > executing subsystem/driver .resume_early() callbacks for them.  This
> > way the potential conflitcs between .suspend_late()/.resume_early()
> > and their runtime PM counterparts are still prevented from happening,
> > but the subtle ordering issues related to disabling/enabling runtime
> > PM for devices during system suspend/resume are much easier to avoid.
> > 
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Jan-Matthias Braun <jan_braun@....net>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> just curious what is the reason for resend? Do you want to gather more 
> Acks before pushing this upstream?

Well, I thought that some people might actually look at it when they found it
again in their mailboxes. :-)

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/