lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 17:50:44 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() On 16 December 2012 17:27, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:10:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 20 November 2012 14:52, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote: >> > We'll need to invoke clk_disable_unprepare() via a pointer in our devm_* >> > conversion so let's uninline the pair. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> >> >> Mike, are you taking these patches? > > And what about my comments, some of which you've failed to reply to? Surprised!! I thought there was nothing missing after the last discussion i remember. Dmitry agreed to drop the first patch and all other looked fine, as nobody objected to them again. Yes, you did in the beginning but there were valid replies to them, on which you never objected. So, i thought its all good now. Can you point again to the issues still left ? -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists