[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121217095508.GB17148@1984>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:55:08 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Handle Cisco 7941/7945
IP phones
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:26:31PM -0800, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> >> What happened to this? OpenWRT is still carrying it, and it broke in
> >> 3.7. Here's a completely untested update...
> >
> > I requested Kevin to resend a new version based on the current kernel
> > tree while spinning on old pending patches since I have no access to
> > that hardware, but no luck.
> >
> > So I'll review this and, since OpenWRT is carrying, I guess we can get
> > this into net-next merge window.
>
> Sorry, been putting it off since the OpenWRT version has worked flawlessly...
>
> I just reassembled my test rig and I'll get you a working patch this week.
>
> Is it OK to use
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git as the
> baseline?
That's fine in this case because no recent changes went into that
code, but better if you use the netfilter next tree:
git://1984.lsi.us.es/nf-next
Thanks Kevin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists