| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:01:49 -0500 From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> CC: Chris Mason <clmason@...ionio.com>, "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@...ntdisaster.de>, Josef Bacik <JBacik@...ionio.com>, Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 04:00:22PM -0700, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Chris, > > After merging the btrfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > fs/btrfs/ioctl.c: In function 'btrfs_ioctl': > fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3940:7: error: case label does not reduce to an integer constant Many thanks Stephen for helping debug this. It turned out to be the size of the ioctl arg was just too big. Stefan, I lowered this by using BTRFS_DEVICE_PATH_NAME_MAX instead, and I also put the char arrays after the u64s. It works here with the progs patch you sent (and matching struct changes), including cancel and the btrfs replace -r mode. I've pushed the result out to my next branch and my for-linus branch, please take a look and make sure I didn't miss anything. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists