| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1355703441.18919.6.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:17:21 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Handle Cisco 7941/7945
IP phones
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 08:52 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le dimanche 21 novembre 2010 à 18:40 -0800, Kevin Cernekee a écrit :
> > [v3:
> > Only activate the new forced_dport logic if the IP matches, but the
> > port does not. ]
> >
> > Most SIP devices use a source port of 5060/udp on SIP requests, so the
> > response automatically comes back to port 5060:
> >
> > phone_ip:5060 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060 100 Trying
> >
> > The newer Cisco IP phones, however, use a randomly chosen high source
> > port for the SIP request but expect the response on port 5060:
> >
> > phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060 100 Trying
> >
> > Standard Linux NAT, with or without nf_nat_sip, will send the reply back
> > to port 49173, not 5060:
> >
> > phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> > proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:49173 100 Trying
> >
> > But the phone is not listening on 49173, so it will never see the reply.
> >
> > This patch modifies nf_*_sip to work around this quirk by extracting
> > the SIP response port from the Via: header, iff the source IP in the
> > packet header matches the source IP in the SIP request.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
> > ---
>
> Thanks for doing this work Keven !
>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
What happened to this? OpenWRT is still carrying it, and it broke in
3.7. Here's a completely untested update...
+ if (!skb_make_writable(skb, skb->len))
+ return NF_DROP;
+
-+ uh = (struct udphdr *)(skb->data + ip_hdrlen(skb));
++ uh = (void *)skb->data + protoff;
+ uh->dest = ct_sip_info->forced_dport;
+
-+ if (!nf_nat_mangle_udp_packet(skb, ct, ctinfo, 0, 0, NULL, 0))
++ if (!nf_nat_mangle_udp_packet(skb, ct, ctinfo, protoff, 0, 0, NU
+ return NF_DROP;
+ }
+
return NF_ACCEPT;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.h b/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.h
index 387bdd0..ba7f571 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.h
@@ -4,12 +4,15 @@
#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
#define SIP_PORT 5060
#define SIP_TIMEOUT 3600
struct nf_ct_sip_master {
unsigned int register_cseq;
unsigned int invite_cseq;
+ __be16 forced_dport;
};
enum sip_expectation_classes {
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
index df8f4f2..72a67bb 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
@@ -1440,8 +1440,25 @@ static int process_sip_request(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
{
enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
+ struct nf_ct_sip_master *ct_sip_info = nfct_help_data(ct);
+ enum ip_conntrack_dir dir = CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo);
unsigned int matchoff, matchlen;
unsigned int cseq, i;
+ union nf_inet_addr addr;
+ __be16 port;
+
+ /* Many Cisco IP phones use a high source port for SIP requests, but
+ * listen for the response on port 5060. If we are the local
+ * router for one of these phones, save the port number from the
+ * Via: header so that nf_nat_sip can redirect the responses to
+ * the correct port.
+ */
+ if (ct_sip_parse_header_uri(ct, *dptr, NULL, *datalen,
+ SIP_HDR_VIA_UDP, NULL, &matchoff,
+ &matchlen, &addr, &port) > 0 &&
+ port != ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u.udp.port &&
+ nf_inet_addr_cmp(&addr, &ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u3))
+ ct_sip_info->forced_dport = port;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sip_handlers); i++) {
const struct sip_handler *handler;
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_sip.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_sip.c
index 16303c7..552e270 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_sip.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_sip.c
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static int map_addr(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
enum ip_conntrack_dir dir = CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo);
+ struct nf_ct_sip_master *ct_sip_info = nfct_help_data(ct);
char buffer[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN + sizeof("[]:nnnnn")];
unsigned int buflen;
union nf_inet_addr newaddr;
@@ -107,7 +108,8 @@ static int map_addr(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
} else if (nf_inet_addr_cmp(&ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.u3, addr) &&
ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.u.udp.port == port) {
newaddr = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u3;
- newport = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u.udp.port;
+ newport = ct_sip_info->forced_dport ? ct_sip_info->forced_dport :
+ ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u.udp.port;
} else
return 1;
@@ -144,6 +146,7 @@ static unsigned int nf_nat_sip(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
enum ip_conntrack_dir dir = CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo);
+ struct nf_ct_sip_master *ct_sip_info = nfct_help_data(ct);
unsigned int coff, matchoff, matchlen;
enum sip_header_types hdr;
union nf_inet_addr addr;
@@ -258,6 +261,20 @@ next:
!map_sip_addr(skb, protoff, dataoff, dptr, datalen, SIP_HDR_TO))
return NF_DROP;
+ /* Mangle destination port for Cisco phones, then fix up checksums */
+ if (dir == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY && ct_sip_info->forced_dport) {
+ struct udphdr *uh;
+
+ if (!skb_make_writable(skb, skb->len))
+ return NF_DROP;
+
+ uh = (void *)skb->data + protoff;
+ uh->dest = ct_sip_info->forced_dport;
+
+ if (!nf_nat_mangle_udp_packet(skb, ct, ctinfo, protoff, 0, 0, NULL, 0))
+ return NF_DROP;
+ }
+
return NF_ACCEPT;
}
@@ -311,8 +328,10 @@ static unsigned int nf_nat_sip_expect(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
enum ip_conntrack_dir dir = CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo);
+ struct nf_ct_sip_master *ct_sip_info = nfct_help_data(ct);
union nf_inet_addr newaddr;
u_int16_t port;
+ __be16 srcport;
char buffer[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN + sizeof("[]:nnnnn")];
unsigned int buflen;
@@ -326,8 +345,9 @@ static unsigned int nf_nat_sip_expect(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
/* If the signalling port matches the connection's source port in the
* original direction, try to use the destination port in the opposite
* direction. */
- if (exp->tuple.dst.u.udp.port ==
- ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u.udp.port)
+ srcport = ct_sip_info->forced_dport ? ct_sip_info->forced_dport :
+ ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u.udp.port;
+ if (exp->tuple.dst.u.udp.port == srcport)
port = ntohs(ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u.udp.port);
else
port = ntohs(exp->tuple.dst.u.udp.port);
--
dwmw2
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (6171 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists