[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121217144932.7769.91648.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:49:32 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: khali@...ux-fr.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Provide guards in uapi/asm/setup.h to prevent
deletion by patch
Provide reinclusion guards in the empty uapi/asm/setup.h to make sure that the
patch program doesn't delete it.
However, should some part of asm/hw_setup.h actually be exported here, or,
possibly, should the entire uapi file be removed? In v3.6, though the file
was marked for export to userspace, it had nothing outside of __KERNEL__.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
---
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/setup.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/setup.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/setup.h
index e69de29..96a4d53 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/setup.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/setup.h
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+#ifndef _UAPI_ASM_X86_SETUP_H
+#define _UAPI_ASM_X86_SETUP_H
+
+#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_X86_SETUP_H */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists