linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] core block IO bits for 3.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121217170016.GA2592@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:00:16 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] core block IO bits for 3.8

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:06:39AM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> writes:
> 
> > - Export control of bdi flusher thread CPU mask and default to using the
> >   home node (if known) from Jeff.
> 
> I certainly wouldn't mind this going in, but I think Tejun NACKed this
> patch.  Tejun?

Hmm... yeah, I would much prefer if this doesn't go in this time.  I
think we need something more generic for threadpools w/ scheduling
restrictions.  It would be possible to retrofit so that the interface
eventually matches but given that this feature isn't an immediate
must-have thing, I think it would be better to not do this right now.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/