linux-kernel - Re: [GIT] Security subsystem updates for 3.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8738z5nx85.fsf@xmission.com>
Date:	Sun, 16 Dec 2012 20:01:14 -0800
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT] Security subsystem updates for 3.8

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:28 AM, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
>> A quiet cycle for the security subsystem with just a few maintenance
>> updates.
>
> Ok, pulled. There were a few trivial conflicts (mostly due to some of
> the key allocation patches having already been merged, and some of the
> kuid/kgid changes due to the userns changes).
>
> I'd like you to double-check the end result, but it *looks* fine.
> Adding both EricB and DavidH to the participants since the conflicts
> were generally due to intetractions with their patches.

I just read through the conflict resolution and I don't see any
kuid/kgid problems.  I am surprised that there were any kuid/kgid
conflicts as all of my changes in that area were in 3.6-rc1.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/