[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121217054240.GA13300@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:42:40 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare_enable() and
clk_disable_unprepare()
Hi Viresh,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 06:35:24PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16 December 2012 18:10, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > Well, there's my comment against patch 2 which never got a reply:
> >
> > "Again, what about stuff not using drivers/clk/clk.c ?"
> >
> > Has this been addressed?
>
> Hmm.. I misread it and thought it is same as breaking other platforms
> because there are
> no dummy routines. But i was wrong :(
>
> So, the problem is, platform not using common-clock framework uses
> this routine, and they
> don't want it to be dummy but call prepare & enable..
>
> Because Dmirty requires this one to be non-inline, either he can move
> these routines to
> drivers/clk/clk-devres.c (which would be wrong) or can add wrappers
> over them in clk-devres
> file.
They do not _have_ to be non-inline, I think we should simply drop the
first 2 patches and I will refresh and ressend the 3rd one.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists