[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86fd45485e2016d2c5ad27f28669195e.squirrel@webmail.universalnet.at>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:20:57 +0100
From: "Bernd Krumböck" <krumboeck@...versalnet.at>
To: "Fabio Baltieri" <fabio.baltieri@...il.com>,
"Bernd Krumboeck" <krumboeck@...versalnet.at>,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
"Kurt Van Dijck" <kurt.van.dijck@....be>,
"Wolfgang Grandegger" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] can: add tx/rx LED trigger support
> Hi Bernd,
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 08:28:48AM +0100, Bernd Krumboeck wrote:
>> Why there is no patch for any usb can device?
>
> Because USB canbus interfaces usually already has some dedicated
> activity LED on the device itself, while this patch is meant to give an
> equivalent functionality for Embedded SoC with GPIO based LEDs, so I
> just started by modifying some Embedded CAN drivers.
>
> If you think it's useful for USB controller, just tell me or modify the
> driver by yourself! As you see the patch is really easy.
At least it is useful for the usb_8dev driver. I'll write a patch.
Photo of the device:
http://www.8devices.com/product/2/usb2can
>> Can this be done in a more general way, except patching every driver?
>
> Actually this started as a generic patch bolted to the CAN stack, but
> the implementation was too invasive and a bit too hacky. A generic
> implementation at can-dev level is hard to obtain because the can-dev
> layer is not used in all the device operation, as the most of the driver
> calls generick network API directly.
>
Thanks!
regards,
Bernd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists