linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: Suppress mm/memory.o warning on older compilers if !CONFIG_NUMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121217124949.3024dda3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:49:49 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Suppress mm/memory.o warning on older compilers if
 !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING

On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:49:17 +0000
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:

> The kbuild test robot reported the following after the merge of Automatic
> NUMA Balancing when cross-compiling for avr32.
> 
> mm/memory.c: In function 'do_pmd_numa_page':
> mm/memory.c:3593: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void
> 
> The code is unreachable but the avr32 cross-compiler was not new enough
> to know that. This patch suppresses the warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> ---
>  mm/memory.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index e6a3b93..23f1fdf 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3590,6 +3590,7 @@ static int do_pmd_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		     unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp)
>  {
>  	BUG();
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */

Odd.  avr32's BUG() includes a call to unreachable(), which should
evaluate to "do { } while (1)".  Can you check that this is working?

Perhaps it _is_ working, but the compiler incorrectly thinks that the
function can return?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/