[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121217212023.GE1844@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:20:23 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: lizefan@...wei.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] cfq-iosched: implement cfq_group->nr_active and
->level_weight
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:18:43PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > I think confusion happens because we are overloading the definition of
> > > cfqg. It is competing with its siblings at the same time it is competing
> > > against its child groups (on behalf of its children tasks).
> >
> > While I agree that part is a bit tricky, I can't think of a much
> > better way to describe it. Any better ideas?
>
> Can we call it cfqg->children_weight insted of cfqg->level_weight.
Hmmm... yeah, why not? I'll rename it.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists