linux-kernel - [PATCH] [RFC] drm/radeon: return 0 on successful gpu reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1355779884.1414.14.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:31:24 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Christian König <deathsimple@...afone.de>,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] drm/radeon: return 0 on successful gpu reset

On an (outdated) laptop the radeon driver (almost always) prints, during
the first resume of each session:
    [drm] crtc 1 is connected to a TV

This message is a bit puzzling as, as far as I know, no TV has ever
been connected to this laptop. Anyhow, before v3.5, if that happened the
radeon driver then printed an error during all following resumes:
    [drm:radeon_cs_ioctl] *ERROR* Failed to parse relocation -35!

(-35 is -EDEADLK.) But the resume would succeed and the driver seemed to
run without too much trouble. From v3.5 onwards things changed. If the
(puzzling) message about crtc 1 was printed on first resume the laptop
would simply hang on second resume. Only a manual power off would then
be possible. In that case nothing of interest would be found in the
(truncated) logs.  And, most annoyingly, the hang would never happen if
the laptop was booted with, say, "console=ttyS0,115200n8" added to the
kernel command line.

I bisected the hang to commit 6c6f478370eccfbfafbdc6fc55c0def03e58f124
("drm/radeon: rework recursive gpu reset handling"), which was added in
the v3.5 release cycle. After discovering that and poking at the driver
it turned out that this hang is triggered by radeon_cs_handle_lockup()
returning -EAGAIN after successfully resetting the gpu. Simply returning
0 makes the hang disappear (and makes the drm error reappear).

Nothing in the code or the commit explanation clarifies why -EAGAIN
should be returned on successful gpu reset. So I suggest
radeon_cs_handle_lockup() simply returns what radeon_gpu_reset()
returns, eg 0 (on success) or a negative error code (on failure).

Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
---
0) This exact patch is untested (but I run something comparable).

1) Sent as an RFC because I do not understand why this laptop (almost
always) prints the "crtc 1" message on first resume. Note that another
workaround for this hang is simply booting with "radeon.tv=0".

2) Also sent as an RFC because I have no idea whatsoever why returning
-EAGAIN will hang the machine. I guess it's returned to userland by
radeon_cs_ioctl(). What code uses that ioctl? And what does that code do
on -EAGAIN that hangs this laptop?

3) A third reason to send this as an RFC is that I also have no idea why
this hang doesn't happen when booting with "console=ttyS0,115200n8" or
even "console=tty0"! But I guess I'm now allowed to call this hang a
Heisenbug.

 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c |    5 +----
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
index 41672cc..a302c00 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
@@ -486,11 +486,8 @@ out:

 static int radeon_cs_handle_lockup(struct radeon_device *rdev, int r)
 {
-	if (r == -EDEADLK) {
+	if (r == -EDEADLK)
 		r = radeon_gpu_reset(rdev);
-		if (!r)
-			r = -EAGAIN;
-	}
 	return r;
 }

-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/