[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121217073815.GM10090@sivaramn-lnx>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:38:15 +0200
From: Sivaram Nair <sivaramn@...dia.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: "rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"shuox.liu@...el.com" <shuox.liu@...el.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"yanmin_zhang@...el.com" <yanmin_zhang@...el.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuidle: fix sysfs output for power_usage
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 01:03:02AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, December 14, 2012 03:17:37 PM Sivaram Nair wrote:
> > cpuidle_state->power_usage is signed; so change the corresponding sysfs
> > ops to output signed value instead of unsigned.
>
> What's actually wrong with printing it as an unsigned int?
power_usage could have negative values (for example cpuidle/driver.c
inits this value to -1, -2 etc. when drv->power_specified is not set) and
these shows up badly in the sysfs output.
regards,
Sivaram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists