[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D01256.1020105@grandegger.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:51:02 +0100
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
CC: rmallon@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
w.sang@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, daniel-gl@....net, sr@...x.de,
plagnioj@...osoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
highguy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/6 v10] gpio: Add block GPIO
On 12/17/2012 10:33 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 17/12/12 20:47, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> On 12/17/2012 07:02 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
>>> On 12/17/2012 06:37 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>> /* Do synchronous data output with a single write access */
>>>> __raw_writel(~mask, pio + PIO_OWDR);
>>>> __raw_writel(mask, pio + PIO_OWER);
>>>> __raw_writel(val, pio + PIO_ODSR);
>>>>
>>>> For caching we would need a storage. Not sure if it's worth compared to
>>>> a context switch into the kernel.
>>>
>>> Block GPIO is not only for you in userspace. ;-) You can also implement
>>> efficient n-bit bus I/O in kernel drivers, n-bit-banging. :-) So not
>>> always context switches involved.
>>
>> OK, what do you think about the following untested patch:
>
> Looks good!
>
> Why "untested"? ;-)
Because I didn't have a chance to test it yet. Will do tomorrow.
Wolfgang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists