[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121218.112129.1344593225772728837.hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:21:29 +0100
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
To: "robherring2@...il.com" <robherring2@...il.com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: tegra: Set SCU base address dynamically from DT
Hi Rob,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote @ Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:00:46 +0100:
> On 12/17/2012 12:18 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > Set Snoop Control Unit(SCU) register base address dynamically from DT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c
> > index 1b926df..45c0b79 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
> > #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> > #include <linux/smp.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> > #include <asm/hardware/gic.h>
> > @@ -36,7 +38,7 @@
> >
> > extern void tegra_secondary_startup(void);
> >
> > -static void __iomem *scu_base = IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_ARM_PERIF_BASE);
> > +static void __iomem *scu_base;
> >
> > #define EVP_CPU_RESET_VECTOR \
> > (IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_EXCEPTION_VECTORS_BASE) + 0x100)
> > @@ -143,14 +145,28 @@ done:
> > return status;
> > }
> >
> > +static const struct of_device_id cortex_a9_scu_match[] __initconst = {
> > + { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-scu", },
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +
> > /*
> > * Initialise the CPU possible map early - this describes the CPUs
> > * which may be present or become present in the system.
> > */
> > static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void)
> > {
> > - unsigned int i, ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base);
> > + struct device_node *np;
> > + unsigned int i, ncores = 1;
> > +
> > + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, cortex_a9_scu_match);
> > + if (!np)
> > + return;
> > + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>
> Did you actually test this? Unless something changed, ioremap does not
> work this early. The only reason to have it mapped this early is to get
> the core count, but that doesn't work on A15 or A7. So we really need to
> get core count/mask in a standard way. At least some work to get core
> count from DT went into 3.8.
>
> BTW, you can get the scu address on the A9 by reading cp15 register:
>
> /* Get SCU base */
> asm("mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0" : "=r" (base));
>
> It's still probably good to have the DT node, but the reg property can
> be optional in this case.
I'm simply wondering, if the above cp15 works with Cortex-A9, do we
still need SCU DT node? At least from Cortex-A15 TRM, it seems that
SCU is tighly integrated into CPU core and it doesn't have any user
control. So Cortex-A15 doesn't seem to need to configure SCU. For
Cortex-A7, I haven't yet found S/W configurable register definitions
in TRM. So if neither of A15/A7 need SCU base, would the above cp15
intructions be enough?
> We need to move away from having the DT matching code within the
> platforms. This should all be moved to the scu code in a scu_of_init
> function that could be called from common code.
True if SCU DT node is still necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists