linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] cpufreq: can't raise max frequency with cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XP9sPUEJPGZtrFqyPhBbAzsPYFBb6sAgbsSuj8qtiX=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:03:36 -0800
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>
Cc:	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...aro.org>,
	Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>,
	Subash <subash.rp@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] cpufreq: can't raise max frequency with cpu_thermal

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org> wrote:
> The cpu_thermal generic thermal management code has a bug where once
> max cpu frequency has been lowered in sysfs (scaling_max_freq) it is
> not possible to raise the max back up later.  The bug is that the
> notifer gets called by __cpufreq_set_policy() before the user policy
> max is raised, and is incorrectly trying to enforce the max frequency
> policy even when we are trying to change the policy.  It is also not
> clear why this driver is looking at the user policy since it is
> primarily supposed to enforce thermal policy, not user set policy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c |    4 ----
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> index 836828e..63bc708 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> @@ -219,10 +219,6 @@ static int cpufreq_thermal_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
>         if (cpumask_test_cpu(policy->cpu, &notify_device->allowed_cpus))
>                 max_freq = notify_device->cpufreq_val;
>
> -       /* Never exceed user_policy.max*/
> -       if (max_freq > policy->user_policy.max)
> -               max_freq = policy->user_policy.max;
> -
>         if (policy->max != max_freq)
>                 cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, max_freq);
>
> --
> 1.7.7.3
>

Sonny's change matches what the "ACPI version" of this code
(drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c) does as well.  I would certainly be
interested to know why the code was added here in the first place.
Amit: do you know?

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/