[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D0AF65.90701@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:01:09 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: cond_resched in tlb_flush_mmu to fix soft lockups
on !CONFIG_PREEMPT
On 12/18/2012 11:11 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Since e303297 (mm: extended batches for generic mmu_gather) we are batching
> pages to be freed until either tlb_next_batch cannot allocate a new batch or we
> are done.
>
> This works just fine most of the time but we can get in troubles with
> non-preemptible kernel (CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE or CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY) on
> large machines where too aggressive batching might lead to soft lockups during
> process exit path (exit_mmap) because there are no scheduling points down the
> free_pages_and_swap_cache path and so the freeing can take long enough to
> trigger the soft lockup.
>
> The lockup is harmless except when the system is setup to panic on
> softlockup which is not that unusual.
>
> The simplest way to work around this issue is to explicitly cond_resched per
> batch in tlb_flush_mmu (1020 pages on x86_64).
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 3.0 and higher
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists