[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D0EB67.2060802@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:17:11 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
nico@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com, will.deacon@....com,
john.stultz@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clockevents: Add generic timer broadcast receiver
On 12/18/12 04:06, Mark Rutland wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> index f113755..c2dd022 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> @@ -125,6 +125,21 @@ int tick_device_uses_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *dev, int cpu)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +int tick_receive_broadcast(void)
> +{
> + struct tick_device *td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device);
> + struct clock_event_device *evt = td->evtdev;
> +
> + if (!evt)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (!evt->event_handler)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
Does this actually happen? It's not obvious to me how it does.
> + evt->event_handler(evt);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Broadcast the event to the cpus, which are set in the mask (mangled).
> */
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists