[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D0FD13.5060508@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:32:35 +0100
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
CC: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kgene.kim@...sung.com, balbi@...com, thomas.abraham@...aro.org,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
p.paneri@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling USB 3.0 phy for samsung-usbphy
driver
On 12/18/2012 04:39 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Adding base address information required for enabling
> USB 3.0 DRD phy on exynos5250 SOC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam<gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> index bbdb2c2..07b7477 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> @@ -316,7 +316,8 @@
>
> usbphy@...30000 {
> compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-usbphy";
> - reg =<0x12130000 0x100>;
> + reg =<0x12130000 0x100>,
> + <0x12100000 0x100>;
Doesn't this second memory region mean distinct PHY controller device ?
Why separate usbphy node can't/shouldn't be created for it ?
> samsung,usb-phyhandle =<&phy_h0&phy_h1&phy_h2>;
> samsung,enable-mask =<1>;
> };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists