[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121219072211.GE2939@squish.home.loc>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 02:22:11 -0500
From: Paul Thompson <set.mailinglist@...il.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: SPARSE_IRQ
Hi;
Perhaps Im being an idiot, but it looks to me like the
menu-item for SPARSE_IRQ (under General setup -> IRQ subsystem)
depends solely on MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ, but I only see *one* user
for that in the kernel now, the SuperH arch (arch/sh/Kconfig). It
looks like everyone else explicitly sets SPARSE_IRQ. However the
menu-items description implies it is a more generic option...
It seems like this menu item used to appear, in a forced
on state, then this condition made it disapear, leaving a blank
IRQ subsystem menu for me. I was trying to work around that, but
now, I am not sure exactly what is supposed to be going on here...
Paul
(from kernel/irq/Kconfig)
config SPARSE_IRQ
bool "Support sparse irq numbering" if MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
---help---
Sparse irq numbering is useful for distro kernels that want
to define a high CONFIG_NR_CPUS value but still want to have
low kernel memory footprint on smaller machines.
( Sparse irqs can also be beneficial on NUMA boxes, as they spread
out the interrupt descriptors in a more NUMA-friendly way. )
If you don't know what to do here, say N.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists