[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121219002722.87438a08.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:27:22 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
Cc: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: recycle id when unloading a rtc driver
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:55:57 +0100 Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de> wrote:
> >
> > I'm all confused.
> >
> > Lothar's patch simply reverts Vincent's patch. And that appears to be
> > the correct thing to so, as the ida_simple_remove() in
> > rtc_device_release() should be sufficient.
> >
> > But apparently that doesn't work, because Vincent was seeing the RTC
> > ID's increment rather than getting reused.
> >
> > Is it the case that rtc_device_release() is not being called sometimes?
> > If so, under what circumstances?
>
> Maybe something (sysfs or whatever) still has a reference to it. Vincent
> should check that.
>
> But I'm sure the ID will be recycled with that put_device() in
> unregister because I've got the same warning as Lothar did when
> (porperly) removing an RTC (with kernel 3.7).
If, as appears to be the case, rtc_device_release() is not being called
then we're also leaking memory. So yes please, it would be good if
someone who can reproduce the IDs-dont-decrease problem could dive in
and work out why ->release() isn't begin called.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists