linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/01] Input multitouch: fix horizontal two-finger-scrolling on Sentelic touchpads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121219084113.GA2758@polaris.bitmath.org>
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:41:13 +0100
From:	"Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@...omail.se>
To:	Christophe TORDEUX <christophe@...deux.net>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Tai-hwa Liang <avatar@...telic.com>,
	Oskari Saarenmaa <os@...u.fi>, Paul Fox <pgf@...top.org>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/01] Input multitouch: fix horizontal
 two-finger-scrolling on Sentelic touchpads

Hi Christophe,

> Fix horizontal two-finger scrolling on Sentelic touchpads. Currently
> horizontal two-fingers scrolling does not work with these touchpads.
> The patch also makes vertical two-finger scrolling smoother in some
> applications e.g. Firefox.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe TORDEUX <christophe@...deux.net>
> ----
> 
> This patch was inspired by the reading of
> drivers/input/mouse/synaptics.c. It is known to work (tested) on
> Sentelic touchpads version STL3888_C0. Very probably works on all later
> versions, and possibly works on some earlier versions of the hardware in
> question.

Thanks for the patch. I would prefer it if this driver was converted
to use input_mt_assign_slots() instead.

> 
> diff -uprN -X vanilla/linux-3.7-rc8/Documentation/dontdiff 
> vanilla/linux-3.7-rc8/drivers/input/mouse/sentelic.c 
> linux-3.7-rc8/drivers/input/mouse/sentelic.c
> --- vanilla/linux-3.7-rc8/drivers/input/mouse/sentelic.c	2012-12-11 04:32:44.476930522 +0100
> +++ linux-3.7-rc8/drivers/input/mouse/sentelic.c	2012-12-12 01:16:41.766018017 +0100
> @@ -706,8 +706,10 @@ static psmouse_ret_t fsp_process_byte(st
>  	struct input_dev *dev = psmouse->dev;
>  	struct fsp_data *ad = psmouse->private;
>  	unsigned char *packet = psmouse->packet;
> +	unsigned char *last_packet = ad->last_pkt;
>  	unsigned char button_status = 0, lscroll = 0, rscroll = 0;
>  	unsigned short abs_x, abs_y, fgrs = 0;
> +	unsigned short last_abs_x, last_abs_y;
>  	int rel_x, rel_y;
>  
>  	if (psmouse->pktcnt < 4)
> @@ -734,6 +736,9 @@ static psmouse_ret_t fsp_process_byte(st
>  
>  		abs_x = GET_ABS_X(packet);
>  		abs_y = GET_ABS_Y(packet);
> +		last_abs_x = GET_ABS_X(last_packet);
> +		last_abs_y = GET_ABS_Y(last_packet);
> +		memcpy(ad->last_pkt, packet, psmouse->pktcnt);

Why not save the variables instead of the array?

>  
>  		if (packet[0] & FSP_PB0_MFMC) {
>  			/*
> @@ -753,10 +758,19 @@ static psmouse_ret_t fsp_process_byte(st
>  					 */
>  					fgrs = 1;
>  					fsp_set_slot(dev, 0, false, 0, 0);
> +
> +					/* We don't need to re-order
> +					 * coordinates if last finger
> +					 * was same finger
> +					 */
> +					last_abs_x = abs_x;
> +					last_abs_y = abs_y;
>  				}
>  				ad->last_mt_fgr = 2;
>  
> -				fsp_set_slot(dev, 1, fgrs == 2, abs_x, abs_y);
> +				fsp_set_slot(dev, 1, fgrs == 2,
> +						max(abs_x, last_abs_x),
> +						max(abs_y, last_abs_y));

Relying on the box (x1, y1, max(x1, x2), max(y1, y2)) seems to assume
a lot about the behavior of the device.

>  			} else {
>  				/* 1st finger */
>  				if (ad->last_mt_fgr == 1) {
> @@ -767,9 +781,18 @@ static psmouse_ret_t fsp_process_byte(st
>  					 */
>  					fgrs = 1;
>  					fsp_set_slot(dev, 1, false, 0, 0);
> +
> +					/* We don't need to re-order
> +					 * coordinates if last finger
> +					 * was same finger
> +					 */
> +					last_abs_x = abs_x;
> +					last_abs_y = abs_y;
>  				}
>  				ad->last_mt_fgr = 1;
> -				fsp_set_slot(dev, 0, fgrs != 0, abs_x, abs_y);
> +				fsp_set_slot(dev, 0, fgrs != 0,
> +						min(abs_x, last_abs_x),
> +						min(abs_y, last_abs_y));
>  			}
>  		} else {
>  			/* SFAC packet */
> @@ -788,12 +811,18 @@ static psmouse_ret_t fsp_process_byte(st
>  			if (abs_x != 0 && abs_y != 0)
>  				fgrs = 1;
>  
> +			/* We don't need to re-order
> +			 * coordinates of SFAC packets
> +			 */
> +			last_abs_x = abs_x;
> +			last_abs_y = abs_y;
> +
>  			fsp_set_slot(dev, 0, fgrs > 0, abs_x, abs_y);
>  			fsp_set_slot(dev, 1, false, 0, 0);
>  		}
>  		if (fgrs > 0) {
> -			input_report_abs(dev, ABS_X, abs_x);
> -			input_report_abs(dev, ABS_Y, abs_y);
> +			input_report_abs(dev, ABS_X, min(abs_x, last_abs_x));
> +			input_report_abs(dev, ABS_Y, min(abs_y, last_abs_y));

Looks like this point could differ from the reported MT positions.

>  		}
>  		input_report_key(dev, BTN_LEFT, packet[0] & 0x01);
>  		input_report_key(dev, BTN_RIGHT, packet[0] & 0x02);
> diff -uprN -X vanilla/linux-3.7-rc8/Documentation/dontdiff vanilla/linux-3.7-rc8/drivers/input/mouse/sentelic.h linux-3.7-rc8/drivers/input/mouse/sentelic.h
> --- vanilla/linux-3.7-rc8/drivers/input/mouse/sentelic.h	2012-12-11 04:32:44.476930522 +0100
> +++ linux-3.7-rc8/drivers/input/mouse/sentelic.h	2012-12-12 01:16:41.954018011 +0100
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct fsp_data {
>  	unsigned char	last_reg;	/* Last register we requested read from */
>  	unsigned char	last_val;
>  	unsigned int	last_mt_fgr;	/* Last seen finger(multitouch) */
> +	unsigned char	last_pkt[8];    /* Last packet we processed from fsp */
>  };
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_SENTELIC

Thanks.
Henrik

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/