[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D19463.5010605@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:18:11 +0100
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>,
<svenkatr@...com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <cjb@...top.org>, <lrg@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc
On 12/19/2012 11:09 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:00:32AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>> I don't know the state of the common clock framework for OMAPs. Is it already
>> up in 3.7? Or going for 3.8? 3.9? 3.10?...
>> We need CCF to resolve this. I can cook up the clock driver for the 32k clock
>> from twl, but in order to use it we need CCF on OMAP.
>
> Well, we at least ought to make sure it doesn't appear in the regulator
> DT bindings even if it's handled via some OMAP magic - that was the key
> point here.
Sure. It must be a clock driver. I already have similar driver (for McPDM fclk
clock) for twl6040.
Let me check linux-next, if CCF is there for OMAP I can send the 32k clock
driver soon (after writing it and testing it). It is going to be for 3.9 but
we can roll it with us I think locally to resolv issues.
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists