[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121219103206.GQ4985@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:32:06 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>,
svenkatr@...com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, cjb@...top.org, lrg@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:18:11AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Sure. It must be a clock driver. I already have similar driver (for McPDM fclk
> clock) for twl6040.
> Let me check linux-next, if CCF is there for OMAP I can send the 32k clock
> driver soon (after writing it and testing it). It is going to be for 3.9 but
> we can roll it with us I think locally to resolv issues.
Well, we still haven't got the foggiest idea what the actual problem is
beyond that it's probably related to the 32kHz clock in some way (unless
it was one of the other reverts that coincidentally made a difference,
but we don't know what they were) so it's unlikely that just randomly
implementing clock support is going to fix anything immediately here.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists