[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D1C652.3050607@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:51:14 +0100
From: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>
To: <balbi@...com>
CC: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
<svenkatr@...com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <cjb@...top.org>, <lrg@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
<r.sricharan@...com>
Subject: Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc
On 12/19/2012 02:01 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +Sricharan who commited that
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On 12/19/2012 11:45 AM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>>>> Well, we still haven't got the foggiest idea what the actual problem is
>>>> beyond that it's probably related to the 32kHz clock in some way (unless
>>>> it was one of the other reverts that coincidentally made a difference,
>>>> but we don't know what they were) so it's unlikely that just randomly
>>>> implementing clock support is going to fix anything immediately here.
>>>
>>> This is exactly what I had to revert (as I mentioned in the other email,
>>> I had to revert the other patches otherwise compilation would break):
>>>
>>> 0e8e5c34 "regulator: twl: Remove references to 32kHz clock from DT bindings"
>>> e76ab829 "regulator: twl: Remove references to the twl4030 regulator"
>>> 029dd3ce "regulator: twl: Remove another unused variable warning"
>>
>> Yeah. 32k clock is not provided by twl.
>>
>> As I said I need to take a look at CCF to see if it already there. If it is
>> clock driver + mapping + patch for wl12xx should fix the issue you are facing.
>>
>>> Let me know if you need more info.
>>
>> BTW: have you happened to ubdate u-boot recently? There is a nice easter egg
>> added there:
>> f3f98bb ARM: OMAP4/5: Do not configure non essential pads, clocks, dplls.
>>
>> Which means that _essential_ clocks and pads are no longer configured.
>
> anything essential you can list ?
Yeah, that u-boot version is just unusable at all with any mainline
kernel, since we are still missing pads conf for every drivers.
Regarding the 32k clock, I noticed as well that the OMAP4460 panda
u-boot is the only one to enable it at boot time, and thus this is the
only board that can probe the wilink chip properly as of today.
Regards,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists