lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:19:37 +0100
From:	Thierry Reding <>
To:	Jesper Nilsson <>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <>,
	Alessandro Zummo <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-pcf8523: Add low battery voltage support

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:10:54PM +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 03:42:26PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> > > +	.read_vl	= pcf8523_rtc_read_vl,
> > 
> > What tree is this based on? None of the trees I have contains .read_vl
> > in rtc_class_ops.
> Hm, I've tested this against a local 3.4 kernel since that is what my
> device had, I didn't realize that we already had some local changes for
> the voltage low stuff.
> I'm guessing the right way is to do it as the pcf8563 in the mainline kernel,
> I'll respin my patch and resend.

From a quick search through the mainline kernel history, there's no
trace of this field.


Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists