linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] clocksource: nomadik-mtu: support timer-based delay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZe4eJ_0ND1gTPFKbXVSXaiCTeLW-m4YjZ87ZoDTiFxhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:34:23 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:	Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] clocksource: nomadik-mtu: support timer-based delay

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:59 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 12/17/2012 10:38 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Fabio Baltieri
>> <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:10:43AM +0100, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
>>>>
>>>> this implements timer-based delay support for nomadik and ux500
>>>> platforms, using the MTU as time source, and marks the u8500 cpufreq
>>>> driver as CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> The patches are based on Arnd's arm-soc/ux500/mtu-clk branch, as that
>>>> contains latest MTU driver developments, including a driver move/rename,
>>>> but I can rebase if necessary.
>>>
>>> The patches applies cleanly on current mainline now, as all dependencies
>>> has already been merged, can this be considered for for merging too?
>>
>> If no clocksource maintainer steps up in a week then notify me and
>> I'll simply stick these into the ux500 tree.
>
> Yea, I'd actually prefer these go through the arch tree where they can get
> testing.

OK, can I have your ACK?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/