[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121219163914.GN5032@mwanda>
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:39:14 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
	Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@...il.com>,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] spi: fix return value check in hspi_probe().
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 03:11:54PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:36:27 -0800 (PST), Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > > According to its documentation, clk_get() returns a "valid IS_ERR() condition
> > > containing errno", so we should call IS_ERR() rather than a NULL check.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@...il.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
> 
> Applied, thanks.
In another thread, we were just talking about who clk_get() can
return a NULL if !CONFIG_HAVE_CLK.  That might change to match the
documentation later...  Not sure.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
